- Isabel Brogsitter-Finck
- May 9, 2020
- 2 min read
Updated: May 12, 2020

In light of the current climate, corporate conglomerates such as McDonald's and Coca-Cola have redesigned their logos to interpret social distancing. However, with brands such as Givenchy and Christian Dior taking physical measures to protect the population, whose actions are having the most impact?
According to Douglas Sellers- Creative Director for Siegel+Gale, promoting social distancing comes with a word of caution. Understanding the fine line between being inspirational and insensitive, brands bear the risk of (potentially) diminishing the severity of our situation, taking for granted the passion, and thought, going into helping, and educating individuals about this global pandemic.

A recent success story: Nike's social media campaign. Featuring star athletes: Lebron James and Tiger Woods, the advertisement recognises the client's feelings of defeat following the closure of several global stores and the cancellation of multiple sporting events. Aiming to inject a sense of hope and optimism into the viewer's hearts, Nike emphasizes the importance of unity and community, reiterating the idea that together, our efforts can have a transcendental effect. However, is this true?

From the perspective of Brian Braiker-Editor-In-Chief of Ad Age, social distancing adverts strike a sour note. Urging brands to take on a more hands-on approach, he commends companies like the Gap (GPS) and LVMH, who have committed to making masks for healthcare workers and manufacture hand sanitizers. Claiming brands to be responsible for providing "real and meaningful services", they are failing to take into consideration the long term perspective towards their ability to contribute and generate physical change.
So what's your opinion? Are conglomerates acting in a controversial or commending way? Have your say by commenting on your thoughts and ideas in the comments section below.
Stay Safe! IsabelBFxox